Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is a surrogate for left ventricular global systolic function, defined as the left ventricular stroke volume divided by the end-diastolic volume.
Point-of-care echocardiography protocols typically use a semi-quantitative approach in defining the ejection fraction, describing the function as hyperdynamic (estimated ejection fraction >70%), normal (55-70%), or depressed (<55%).
If the global function is depressed it is then appropriate to further describe the dysfunction as mild (40-55%), moderate (30-40%), or severe (<30%).
A global visual assessment of left ventricular systolic function precedes formal quantification of ejection fraction. A gestalt of systolic function may be inferred from the degree of inward endocardial motion, myocardial thickening, longitudinal motion of the mitral annulus, and the overall geometry of the ventricle.
Visual estimates can be accurate as more complex time‐consuming measurements in assessing left ventricular ejection fraction 4,5.
- mitral valve E point septal separation (EPSS, normal <7 mm) 1
- the distance between the anterior mitral valve leaflet and the interventricular septum in early diastole
- an EPSS >7 mm is 100% sensitive for a severely depressed ejection fraction (EF <30%) 7
- a cutoff EPSS >8 mm was 83.3% sensitive and 50.0% specific for any systolic dysfunction
- as derived from comparison with MRI, LVEF, (75.5 x 2.5) x EPSS roughly equates ejection fraction 8
- fractional shortening (normal range 25-45%)
- assessed immediately distal to the tips of the mitral valve leaflets in the parasternal long axis view 3
- the ventricular dimensions at end-diastole (LVIDd) and end-systole (LVIDs) are used to calculate a percent change
- FS = (LVIDd - LVIDs) / LVIDd
- fractional shortening x 2 roughly equates ejection fraction
- biplane method of discs (modified Simpson’s rule)
- using two orthogonal apical views, the endocardial border is outlined in end-diastole and end-systole
- the ventricle is divided along its long axis into a series of disks of equal height, and ventricular volume is calculated as the sum of the volume of the disks
- mitral annular plane systolic excursion
- m-mode pick directed at the septal (and/or lateral) mitral annulus
- maximal apical excursion measured in mm
- suggestive of decreased EF when <11 mm
- fractional area change (normal range 35-65%)
- the endocardium is traced at end systole and end diastole in the parasternal short axis at the mid-papillary level
- FAC = (LV end-diastolic area - LV end systolic area) / LVEDA
General imaging differential considerations for a reduced ejection fraction include:
- regional wall motion abnormality
- non-perpendicular alignment of the M-mode line in relation to the long axis of the LV
- poor delineation of the endocardial and epicardial borders
- abnormal left ventricular geometry
- such as aneurysmal remodelling
- valvular pathology
- 1. McKaigney CJ, Krantz MJ, La Rocque CL, Hurst ND, Buchanan MS, Kendall JL. E-point septal separation: a bedside tool for emergency physician assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction. (2014) The American journal of emergency medicine. 32 (6): 493-7. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2014.01.045 - Pubmed
- 2. Mark DG, Ku BS, Carr BG, Everett WW, Okusanya O, Horan A, Gracias VH, Dean AJ. Directed bedside transthoracic echocardiography: preferred cardiac window for left ventricular ejection fraction estimation in critically ill patients. (2007) The American journal of emergency medicine. 25 (8): 894-900. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2007.01.023 - Pubmed
- 3. Weekes AJ, Reddy A, Lewis MR, Norton HJ. E-point septal separation compared to fractional shortening measurements of systolic function in emergency department patients: prospective randomized study. (2012) Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine. 31 (12): 1891-7. Pubmed
- 4. Lill Bergenzaun, Petri Gudmundsson, Hans Öhlin, Joachim Düring, Anders Ersson, Lilian Ihrman, Ronnie Willenheimer, Michelle S Chew. Assessing left ventricular systolic function in shock: evaluation of echocardiographic parameters in intensive care. (2011) Critical Care. 15 (4): R200. doi:10.1186/cc10368 - Pubmed
- 5. Bergenzaun L, Gudmundsson P, Öhlin H, Düring J, Ersson A, Ihrman L, Willenheimer R, Chew MS. Assessing left ventricular systolic function in shock: evaluation of echocardiographic parameters in intensive care. (2011) Critical care (London, England). 15 (4): R200. doi:10.1186/cc10368 - Pubmed
- 6. Graham D. Cole, Niti M. Dhutia, Matthew J. Shun-Shin, Keith Willson, James Harrison, Claire E. Raphael, Massoud Zolgharni, Jamil Mayet, Darrel P. Francis. Defining the real-world reproducibility of visual grading of left ventricular function and visual estimation of left ventricular ejection fraction: impact of image quality, experience and accreditation. (2015) The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging. 31 (7): 1303. doi:10.1007/s10554-015-0659-1 - Pubmed
- 7. McKaigney CJ, Krantz MJ, La Rocque CL, Hurst ND, Buchanan MS, Kendall JL. E-point septal separation: a bedside tool for emergency physician assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction. (2014) The American journal of emergency medicine. 32 (6): 493-7. doi:10.1016/j.ajem.2014.01.045 - Pubmed
- 8. Silverstein JR, Laffely NH, Rifkin RD. Quantitative estimation of left ventricular ejection fraction from mitral valve E-point to septal separation and comparison to magnetic resonance imaging. (2006) The American journal of cardiology. 97 (1): 137-40. doi:10.1016/j.amjcard.2005.07.118 - Pubmed
- 9. Wright J, Jarman R, Connolly J, Dissmann P. Echocardiography in the emergency department. (2009) Emergency medicine journal : EMJ. 26 (2): 82-6. doi:10.1136/emj.2008.058560 - Pubmed